🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded panel of 11 judges. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the latest development in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since late September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities maintain that local officers have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been posting footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the forces.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”